Reply to comment
Good V's bad bacteria
July 6, 2009
by Anonymous,
20 weeks 5 days ago
Comment: 37764
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
If there is bad bacteria and good bacteria then why don't we just leave it. If the world is as you say a constant battle between good and evil, good and bad, then obviously there is a winner or just even, and the best thing to do would be to leave it, unless you think that you've ran your hand through poo been crawling through a subway and running your hands along the train platform!