Reply to comment
This does not explain the
August 7, 2007
by Anonymous (not verified),
2 years 16 weeks ago
Comment: 24475
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
This does not explain the cooling period observed between 1940 and 1970. the reason for this cooling is due to emissions of SO2 into the atmosphere before and around that time. Since laws and restrictions against CFC's and emitters of SO2 have come into place, this cooling period has ceased and the warming trend observed between 1910 - 1940 has since continued. On this basis alone I can state that the article is incorrect in its findings