Reply to comment
These two techniques have
July 9, 2007
by gordman (not verified),
2 years 20 weeks ago
Comment: 24169
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
These two techniques have advantages and disadvantages. Acupressure is a good old technique and no doubt has great results. Yet, physical therapy is the subject of intense research and has known improvements all along. Most people are trained in physical therapy continued education programs and most people trust this technique. Acupressure and physical therapy are very different, we cannot draw the line and exclude one of them, we might loose more this way. I think the best way is a combination of the two.