Skip to content

ARKANSAS RADIATION INDUCED CANCERS LINKED TO FALLOUT FROM NUCLEAR TESTING

November 14, 2008

Here is the link with map and photo. http://russllade.blogspot.com
By Russell Ade
Scientist
Batesville, AR.
11-14-2008

ARKANSAS RADIATION INDUCED CANCERS LINKED TO FALLOUT FROM NUCLEAR TESTING 

Here in Arkansas with way above normal cancer rates, the survivors linked to radiation induced cancers asked me to find the source of radiation that caused their cancers. Radioactive fallout from the 1950's nuclear weapons tests in Nevada spread throughout most of the nation, but the hottest spots were in the Midwest and Northwest, according to government projections.

Data, was compiled by the National Cancer Institute as part federal study over a decade ago. It was the first to show high exposure rates outside Nevada and Utah. Some of the highest doses of fallout were received by milk drinking children here in Arkansas.

 
  From earlier studies, exposure rates were highest in 12 states east and north of the Nevada desert: ARKANSAS, Missouri,Nevada,Utah, Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, Idaho, Montana, and Colorado.

  Because the total exposure was tied to such factors as weather patterns and milk-consumption rates, some hot spots, were isolated. Here in Arkansas most of us know how a thunderstorm can rain on one side of the street and the other side of the street will be dry. Also at the time of the fallout there were a lot of milk cows and dairies here in Arkansas.

  Exposure in hot spot counties was average up to 160 rads for children. At 10 rads exposure the Federal government recommends people be monitored by a doctor. Adults averaged 16 rads, and neither children nor adults were monitored or informed of their exposure.

  Not wanting to raise fears or anxiety or be paid federal compensation for the high exposure of fallout like the residents of Utah were. Arkansas with high exposure of fallout, and other states were put on the back burner. Maybe the thought was if they don't know about it, by the time they find out most of the cancer victims will be deceased. They are not very bright, they probably won't understand something they can't see.

  The handling of these nuclear incidents was either ineptitude or extraordinary contrived efforts to withhold information. Probably both. Some of the first words the cancer survivors here heard from the doctors after being diagnosed with radiation induced cancer were, "Have you been exposed to Radiation"

   The hot spots in ARKANSAS are BAXTER, BENTON, FULTON, INDEPENDENCE, JACKSON, MADISON, and WASHINTON counties.
 
  I believe we need to notify all affected areas immediately and test all schools/colleges and public gathering places in all the affected areas. If nothing comes out of it then it's a good exercise in Home Land Security. Then start testing areas with the highest cancer rates until all public and private land is tested in the affected areas.

  Hot spots if any need to be identified and monitored. Perhaps if we do this we can end the cycle of radiation induced cancers in these areas. I want to know is my home and property radioactive? You wouldn't want to put a child's sandbox or swing over a hot spot, and without testing we do not know.

  If the fallout happened today in the 12 states that are considered affected with hot spots, and it was a terrorist attack It would be the worse attack on US soil in history, it would make 9/11 look small and would be monitored for decades if not centuries. Again it is a remarkable demonstration of ineptitude to not test and monitor the residents and counties affected.

  
 

Comments

Update on Fallout

December 1, 2008 by outsidethebox, 30 weeks 5 days ago
Comment id: 33160

I have just ordered some testing equipment. I am not looking forward to what I may find.

I talked to the head of civil defense from back in that time period. It seems the government would give $10,000 for new uranium discoveries. He put a call out on the radio for rock samples ... well $10,000 was a lot of money in that time, and people from all over the county brought him thousands of pounds of rocks.

He tested them and they were all radioactive so he sent them off to be assayed. They were going to be rich! Well, the rocks were radioactive but no uranium ore was in them. So he tested the leaves, the trees, the grass, rocks, bushes, dirt, even the tires on the cars. They were all radioactive off the Geiger counter scale!

Those rocks were a good cross section of the surrounding areas. Being that he tested thousands of pounds from folks throughout the area. The $10,000 reward could buy you a ranch back in those days. It was like the lottery and everyone wanted to play. At that time the radio was bigger out here than TV.

I have had the first weekly local meeting about this problem. Unfortunately the apathy is unbelievable its like a third world country where life does not have much value. More information is constantly coming up, like hot spots in certain areas. I will keep up the meetings and start testing when the equipment is up and running.

all cancers or just thyroid cancer?

November 15, 2008 by Anonymous, 33 weeks 6 hours ago
Comment id: 32883

As far as I know, the National Cancer Institute's study only addresses the exposure to the thyroid gland and the subsequent risk of thyroid cancer. I know of no study that shows a link between observed cancers in Arkansas and past exposure to weapons fallout. To date, detailed epidemiological studies have been limited to chidren exposed in the counties of UT, NV, and AZ during the 1950's. These studies show a link for thyroid neoplasms and thyroiditis, but not thyroid cancer per se, although non-cancerous thyroid neoplasms are known to be predictors for thyroid cancer in later life.

More information can be obtained on the doses and risks of past exposure to Nevada Test Site fallout by going to http://ntsi131.nci.nih.gov/ and http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/feature/fallout-from-nuclear-wea...



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.