Take a gold sample the size of the head of a push pin, shoot a laser through it, and suddenly more than 100 billion particles of anti-matter appear.
The anti-matter, also known as positrons, shoots out of the target in a cone-shaped plasma “jet.”
This new ability to create a large number of positrons in a small laboratory opens the door to several fresh avenues of anti-matter research, including an understanding of the physics underlying various astrophysical phenomena such as black holes and gamma ray bursts.
Anti-matter research also could reveal why more matter than anti-matter survived the Big Bang at the start of the universe.
“We’ve detected far more anti-matter than anyone else has ever measured in a laser experiment,” said Hui Chen, a Livermore researcher who led the experiment. “We’ve demonstrated the creation of a significant number of positrons using a short-pulse laser.”
Chen and her colleagues used a short, ultra-intense laser to irradiate a millimeter-thick gold target. “Previously, we concentrated on making positrons using paper-thin targets,” said Scott Wilks, who designed and modeled the experiment using computer codes. “But recent simulations showed that millimeter-thick gold would produce far more positrons. We were very excited to see so many of them.”
In the experiment, the laser ionizes and accelerates electrons, which are driven right through the gold target. On their way, the electrons interact with the gold nuclei, which serve as a catalyst to create positrons. The electrons give off packets of pure energy, which decays into matter and anti-matter, following the predictions by Einstein’s famous equation that relates matter and energy. By concentrating the energy in space and time, the laser produces positrons more rapidly and in greater density than ever before in the laboratory.
“By creating this much anti-matter, we can study in more detail whether anti-matter really is just like matter, and perhaps gain more clues as to why the universe we see has more matter than anti-matter,” said Peter Beiersdorfer, a lead Livermore physicist working with Chen.
Particles of anti-matter are almost immediately annihilated by contact with normal matter, and converted to pure energy (gamma rays). There is considerable speculation as to why the observable universe is apparently almost entirely matter, whether other places are almost entirely anti-matter, and what might be possible if anti-matter could be harnessed. Normal matter and anti-matter are thought to have been in balance in the very early universe, but due to an “asymmetry” the anti-matter decayed or was annihilated, and today very little anti-matter is seen.
Over the years, physicists have theorized about anti-matter, but it wasn’t confirmed to exist experimentally until 1932. High-energy cosmic rays impacting Earth’s atmosphere produce minute quantities of anti-matter in the resulting jets, and physicists have learned to produce modest amounts of anti-matter using traditional particle accelerators. Anti-matter similarly may be produced in regions like the center of the Milky Way and other galaxies, where very energetic celestial events occur. The presence of the resulting anti-matter is detectable by the gamma rays produced when positrons are destroyed when they come into contact with nearby matter.
Laser production of anti-matter isn’t entirely new either. Livermore researchers detected anti-matter about 10 years ago in experiments on the since-decommissioned Nova “petawatt” laser – about 100 particles. But with a better target and a more sensitive detector, this year’s experiments directly detected more than 1 million particles. From that sample, the scientists infer that around 100 billion positron particles were produced in total.
Until they annihilate, positrons (anti-electrons) behave much like electrons (just with an opposite charge), and that’s how Chen and her colleagues detected them. They took a normal electron detector (a spectrometer) and equipped it to detect particles with opposite polarity as well.
“We’ve entered a new era,” Beiersdorfer said. “Now, that we’ve looked for it, it’s almost like it hit us right on the head. We envision a center for antimatter research, using lasers as cheaper anti-matter factories.”
Chen will present her work at the American Physical Society's Division of Plasma Physics meeting Nov. 17-21 at the Hyatt Regency Reunion in Dallas. S.C. Wilks, E. Liang, J. Myatt, K. Cone ,L. Elberson, D.D. Meyerhofer, M. Schneider, R. Shepherd, D. Stafford, R. Tommasini, P. Beiersdorfer are the collaborators on this project.
Founded in 1952, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is a national security laboratory, with a mission to ensure national security and apply science and technology to the important issues of our time. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is managed by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration.
https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2008/NR-08-11-03.html
Comments
antimatter
February 13, 2009 by Anonymous, 20 weeks 1 day ago
Comment id: 34551
Quite simply this "god-particle" is the answer to a great myriad of energy based questions, such as electric generation to thrust and then many Im sure we as a lowly distracted species have yet to ask. As for now these miniscule experiments are completely harmless and possibly offer a "holy grail" if you will for our growing energy delemas. Leave the science to the proffessionals and you paranoid idiots stick to your football and sunday school
Re: Curing the no user name problem
November 21, 2008 by Halliday, 32 weeks 1 day ago
Comment id: 32993
Fred:
I guess I should have been more clear (though I thought it would have been obvious that I had, indeed, logged in, since my user name was attached to my message/comment). I was responding to the comment:
from the Anonymous commenter that made the "We all be wankers!" comment.
However, I thank you for your "endorsement" of the "worth" of my comments. :-)
David
Curing the no user name problem
November 20, 2008 by Fred Bortz, 32 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 32969
David,
If you login and then reload the page, that should work. Since I like to read your comments, please try again.
If that doesn't work, try logging in as the anti-David and annihilate the site :)
Fred Bortz -- Science and technology books for young readers (www.fredbortz.com) and Science book reviews (www.scienceshelf.com)
Why is there no user name field shown?
November 20, 2008 by Halliday, 32 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 32965
The idea is to Register/Login, as I have done.
David
We all be wankers!
November 19, 2008 by Anonymous, 32 weeks 3 days ago
Comment id: 32934
[roflol] And I thought the British had a sense of humor. I intended my original post titled Anti-matter to be tongue in cheek. Sorry that you felt you had to get up on your high and mighty horse.
However, scientific discovery at all costs can have unforeseen or unintended consequences. Witness nano-particles for instance, where there is some research indicating that these particles are outside of nature and may cause problems for humans health and well-being.
btw: Why is there no user name field shown. It seems that one can only make "anonymous" posts.
You people are all a bunch of morons
November 18, 2008 by Anonymous, 32 weeks 4 days ago
Comment id: 32928
To Anonymous on Tue, 2008-11-18 15:41 and Anonymous on Mon, 2008-11-17 23:21:
Seriously, if you were living 200 years ago, I'm sure you'd be lobbying to prevent those crazy scientists and engineers from creating the first railways because you'd be convinced, based on your backward, circumstantial and anecdotal understanding of science, that any human would die if he traveled faster than 30 miles an hour, all based on hearsay gleaned from morons just as ignorant as yourselves.
To the first ignorant wanker, the energy released when the positrons annihilate with electrons can be no more than the energy of the particle beam that generated them in the first place. MORON! So no, there's no danger of world-shattering explosions.
The same comment to the second ignorant wanker, who also expressed his irrational fears about the LHC. Has anyone else noticed that exclusively the people with at least a little bit of scientific knowledge are the ones who say it's safe? The LHC isn't going to destroy the world either. If those puny collisions could generate anything dangerous to the very existence of a planet such as Earth, it would have been gone long before life even had time to develop on it due to cosmic ray bombardment which produces collisions which are billions upon billions of times more powerful (look up "oh-my-god particle") than anything the LHC can do. Then again, you probably believe the world was created in 6 days, or 7 days, or whatever it is you morons believe.
I'll bet you also fell for the "ban dihydrogen monoxide" prank (look it up on wikipedia). Me, I SWIM in the stuff!
Re:Anti-matter
November 18, 2008 by Anonymous, 32 weeks 4 days ago
Comment id: 32923
"This is why we have no real evidence of alien races. They probably all get to the same stage of development and then some crazed scientist destroys the planet."
Ha ha, you might be right. Seriously, we really should "back up" the Earth before doing these experiments, e.g., making a sustainable colony an another planet. Scientists are always in such a rush to advance, it's going to come back and bite us.
And 100 billion anti-particles sounds to a layperson like myself to be enough to make a pretty terrific bang if they all went off in a short period of time, at least enough to take out the lab itself. Maybe, being anti-electrons, they weren't massive enough to be as dangerous as anti-protons or anti-neutrons.
new memory device
November 18, 2008 by Anonymous, 32 weeks 4 days ago
Comment id: 32907
I wonder if positrons could be generated and create detectable changes if a platinum-iridium target was used instead of gold. One might even think of it as a positronic brain--Asimov was right!!
Anti-matter
November 17, 2008 by Anonymous, 32 weeks 4 days ago
Comment id: 32905
If the black hole from the LHC doesn't get us, then maybe the anti-matter factories will!
This is why we have no real evidence of alien races. They probably all get to the same stage of development and then some crazed scientist destroys the planet. Oh well...
Post new comment