Height may point to a biological basis for pedophilia, according to new research released by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH). The study found that pedophilic males were shorter on average than males without a sexual attraction to children.
The study, published in Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, suggests that pedophiles may have been exposed to pre-birth conditions that affected their physical development. The researchers observed this height difference by analyzing the files of over 1,000 men who were assessed for pedophilia or other sexual disorders between 1995 and 2006 at the Kurt Freund Laboratory in Toronto, Canada.
A difference in average height is a trait found in other illnesses with biological links. The average difference in height was two centimeters, which is similar to the shorter height associated with schizophrenia or Alzheimer’s disease.
Further research is necessary, but this finding re-enforces evidence that pedophilia has a biological cause, possibly related to brain development before birth.
“This research does not mean that pedophiles are not criminally responsible for their behavior,” said Dr. James Cantor, CAMH Psychologist and lead researcher on the study, “but the discovery of biological markers for pedophilia has important implications for future study and possibly treatment.”
This study adds to previous research from this team that found pedophiles have lower IQs, are three times more likely to be left-handed, failed school grades significantly more frequently, and suffered more head injuries as children.
Comments
" Does this make all Japanese
June 12, 2009 by Anonymous, 3 weeks 8 hours ago
Comment id: 37231
" Does this make all Japanese more prone to pedophilia because they are shorter than Danes?"
You're an idiot (possibly shorter than average?)". "Shorter than average" here means 'Within a population'. No one said we start comparing males of different populations.
-Julie
Pedophilia
October 24, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 36 weeks ago
Comment id: 25650
There was a study using iPET scans of pedophile and non-pedophile sex offenders that suggested that there was some "neural intrusion" or simultaneous activation of areas in the brains in pedophiles (not non-pedophiles) that were associated with sexuality and an instinct for caring for the young. I heard nothing about it since. Could some smart person help me with this? I can't seem to find anything on the 'net.
Also, I heard that the association of pedophilia due to having been abused as a child by family members causing "familial", learned pedophilia was unsubstantiated by twin and adoption studies of newborn children from families-of-origin that had pedophile members, that developed pedophilia in adulthood although they had not experienced sexual abuse as children.
I am an activist against CSA, a lay volunteer. One thing that has fascinated me is that many, NOT ALL, perps have strong similarities in physical traits. I always wondered if I was just imagining this, but since the left-handed and short stature correlations came out I'm not so sure. I am hoping, actually pleading for somebody who is knowledgeable in the field to answer some of my questions including this one: Some (a lot) of pedophiles have; an almost lip-less, under-developed down-turned mouth and under-developed lower face and jaw; a "soft",narrow-shouldered, slack physique. Many need very heavy vision correction. These characteristics also seem like they could point to compromised pregnancy?
Please believe that I absolutely will not quote anyone that can speak to my questions.
Sincerely, Laura Wrzeski
Pedophilia...
October 24, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 36 weeks ago
Comment id: 25646
The anonymous poster above does not seem to be giving a cogent arguement, so it is difficult to refute. However, I do feel his outrage is misplaced and will try to guess what his argument really is based upon so that I may comment.
He seems to feel that corralation can't be causal, so it must not exist. But, corralations don't have to be causal to exist. In this case, something that leads down a developmental pathway towards pedophilia also led to reduced height. He also seems to assume that researchers didn't appreciate that a population can be malnourished, leading to reduced height, using misplaced sarcasm to cast doubt on the results. Personally, I will give the researchers the benefit of the doubt that they were comparing height to a suitable control group with a similar nutritional history.
There are interesting correlations between height and sexuality. For instance, Klinefelter's Syndrome (XXY sex chromosomes) correlates with taller individuals than nominally normal men (XY). In this case the difference is even greater, at about four centimeters. Individuals with Klinefelter's are far more likely to be attracted to other men. On a more subtle sexual minority, Male-to-Female transgendered (MtF) persons are also found to be taller than average. In both cases, this is believed to be caused by delayed onset of puberty allowing greater bone growth before maturation. The delayed puberty is concommitant with incomplete masculinization.
Here I am going to offer a speculative hypothesis. Could it be possible that pedophilia is correlated with hyper or early masculinization? Masculinized brains tend to be sexually attracted to feminine bodies. Feminine bodies and most importantly, faces, also exhibit greater neoteny than do masculine bodies and faces. That is to say, that women look younger, more like children, than do men. A woman's nose, ears, and chin are smaller. The face is clear, devoid of facial hair. The forehead is rounder. Her hair is fuller, softer, and straighter. Her average height is shorter... Doesn't this sound like a child? Can pedophilia be attraction to exagerated feminine traits, but also lacking the attraction to specific *adult* female traits such as breasts and wider hips, etc.?
So, might we not find a correlation with hyper or early masculinization, anomoulous brain lateralization and thus left handedness (male brains are more lateralized than female brains), lower IQ, and shorter stature... all also statistically greater correlated with the development of pedophilia? This seems a possibility to me.
Finally, we don't criminalize pedophilia by itself. Or at least we shouldn't... it is the act of an adult violating the rights of a minor that is the criminal act. No child should ever, ever be so treated. Pity the man who finds that he has pedophilial feelings and understands that he can never act on those feelings. But have NO pity whatsoever for the man who molests a child. Innate feelings or not... it is still wrong to involve a child. Thus, we separate our sense of moral outrage of a man's pedophilial leanings from his behavior.
Still and all... it would be very valuable to understand the etiology of pedophilia so that it might be detected, prevented, or treated before a child is molested. Sarcastically deriding our first tentative steps toward scientific discovery is counter productive.
--Candice H. Brown Elliott
Male height as a marker for pedophilia-give me a break!
October 24, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 36 weeks ago
Comment id: 25638
"A difference in average height is a trait found in other illnesses with biological links...This study adds to previous research from this team that found pedophiles have lower IQs, are three times more likely to be left-handed, failed school grades significantly more frequently, and suffered more head injuries as children."
So which is it, height, lower IQs, left-handed, propensity to fail in school several times or to have had several head injuries as children?
"The study found that pedophilic males were shorter on average than males without a sexual attraction to children." So does this CAMH study sully ALL males who are below the average height of the country they are in today? Does this make all Japanese more prone to pedophilia because they are shorter than Danes?
And this statement is ludicrous after the findings that are stated: "“This research does not mean that pedophiles are not criminally responsible for their behavior,†said Dr. James Cantor, CAMH Psychologist and lead researcher on the study, “but the discovery of biological markers for pedophilia has important implications for future study and possibly treatment.â€" Well, if biology produces pedophilic tendencies then it shouldn't make the pedos responsible. After all, no matter how reprehensible we may find the aberrant behaviour, it's in their genes. I think it's like saying that if you are born gay you should not instinctively desire a homosexual relationship.
Post new comment